SolvixLabs is Nader Cheble, an industrial engineer working with high-mix, low-volume machine shops. I read two exports — your quote log with won and lost, and closed jobs with estimated against actual hours — and show you which part families you win, which ones you quoted light, and what to price up. Founder-led. Never a look at your prints, CAD or specs.
I find the specific place your business is losing revenue — a quote nobody followed up on, a lead that sat too long, a customer who went quiet — then build the system that fixes it. I don’t hand it over and disappear. I stay on and run it. You deal with me, not an account manager.
running diagnostic…
Three steps. No prints, no CAD, and nothing to install.
A quote log — date, customer, part, value, won or lost. And closed jobs — estimated hours, actual hours, material cost, outside processing. Straight out of your ERP, or out of the spreadsheets you actually use. Nothing else, and no prints.
Hit rate by customer, part family, quote value band and response time. Estimated against actual hours by part family and by machine. Which customers you win from, and whether those are the ones whose work actually paid.
Written plainly, with the numbers under every claim, and a call to walk you through it. If something is worth building after that, we scope it then. If nothing is, I tell you that instead.
A quote log — date, customer, part, value, won or lost. And closed jobs — estimated hours, actual hours, material cost, outside processing. Straight out of your ERP, or out of the spreadsheets you actually use. Nothing else, and no prints.
Hit rate by customer, part family, quote value band and response time. Estimated against actual hours by part family and by machine. Which customers you win from, and whether those are the ones whose work actually paid.
Written plainly, with the numbers under every claim, and a call to walk you through it. If something is worth building after that, we scope it then. If nothing is, I tell you that instead.
Every shop's numbers are its own. These are the places a high-mix shop most often loses margin it had already earned.
Which customers, part families and quote value bands you actually win — and which ones you spend estimating hours on for nothing. Win rates stratify hard, and the expensive quoting is usually concentrated where the rate is lowest.
Not every business is a fit. We would rather be upfront about that than waste your time or ours.
No client case studies exist yet, and none are claimed here. What is on offer is the method and the numbers it reads — judge it on that.
›The review reads what your shop already records. Nothing new gets installed, and nothing you run today gets replaced.
›Every finding carries the numbers underneath it, so you can check it against what you already believe about your own shop.
›Where the quote log cannot answer a question, the review says so instead of filling the gap with a guess.
No client case studies exist yet. These are reasons to take a first call, not proof of a result.
Founded and run by Nader Cheble, industrial engineer.
Most vendors hand you a build and move to the next client. I stay on after the work goes in — watching what it does, fixing what breaks, adjusting as the shop changes. If it is not doing what we scoped, I keep working it until it does, instead of walking away once it is live.
I was trained to take waste and rework out of manufacturing operations — cycle times, throughput, scrap, setup against run time. I am not a developer guessing at how a shop runs. When the estimator becomes the bottleneck between an RFQ and a booked job, that is a queueing problem before it is a software problem.
The review never touches prints, CAD, STEP files or specs. It reads a quote log and a job history, which are the two things your shop already records. That is also why customer NDAs and export-controlled drawings never come into it.
I read two exports out of your shop — a quote log with won and lost, and closed jobs with estimated against actual hours — and hand back what they say. Hit rate by customer, part family and quote value band. Where quoted hours ran under actual, and on which parts. Which part families to price up, and which to stop quoting.
The review either finds something in your numbers or it does not. If it does not, you are out two exports and I am out a week. Anything built after that is scoped against a written definition of done, agreed before the work starts.
The system is live and running within 21 days of the first call. You will see the basic mechanics working right away - nothing sitting unanswered, follow-up going out on schedule. What counts as a result is something we define together before we build, based on your business, not a guess.
21 days from your first call to a live, running system. Days 1 to 5 are discovery and scoping. Days 5 to 7 you review and approve the spec. Days 7 to 21 we build and test in your real operation. We tell you upfront if scope means it takes longer.
Pricing isn't standard because the diagnosis isn't standard - it depends on what we find and what we build. We talk about it on a call, once we both know what we are actually solving.
No. You bring the context: who your ideal client is, what is not working, what good results look like. SolvixLabs handles everything technical from start to finish. We build it, test it in your real environment, and hand it over working.
Whatever makes sense for your situation. We work inside your existing stack where possible. We only introduce new tools when they solve a real problem your current setup cannot handle. No vendor lock-in. Your data stays in your own accounts.
Yes. Your data lives in your own accounts. We operate with access you grant and can revoke at any time. We do not store your business data on our servers and we do not need to.